https://www.redmine.org/
https://www.redmine.org/favicon.ico?1679302129
2011-09-27T13:02:36Z
Redmine
Redmine - Defect #9331: Status list is sometimes missing values
https://www.redmine.org/issues/9331?journal_id=32530
2011-09-27T13:02:36Z
Etienne Massip
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> set to <i>Invalid</i></li></ul><p>Guess that these statuses are not included in the workflows defined for your users role.</p>
<p>Please reopen if really needed.</p>
Redmine - Defect #9331: Status list is sometimes missing values
https://www.redmine.org/issues/9331?journal_id=32531
2011-09-27T13:28:56Z
Mischa The Evil
<ul></ul>Two things that come in mind:
<ol>
<li>Could it be related to <a class="wiki-page" href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineIssueTrackingSetup#Workflow">workflow issues</a>?<br />For an example, see the <a class="wiki-page" href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/FAQ#Ive-created-a-new-issue-status-but-I-cant-use-it-it-doesnt-show-up-in-the-status-drop-down-list">FAQ</a></li>
<li>Could it be related to the behaviour of the "Blocked by" <a class="wiki-page" href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineIssues#Related-issues">issue-relations</a>?<br />If an issue is blocked by another issue that has an open status, then statues which are <a class="wiki-page" href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineIssueTrackingSetup#Issue-statuses">configured to behave as closed issue statuses</a> are rejected from the status-list.<br />For more details about the implementation of this feature see issues <a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-4 priority-default closed" title="Defect: Actually block issues from closing when relation 'blocked by' isn't closed (Closed)" href="https://www.redmine.org/issues/1740">#1740</a>, <a class="issue tracker-3 status-5 priority-4 priority-default closed" title="Patch: Patch to prevent blocked issues from being closed (Closed)" href="https://www.redmine.org/issues/2132">#2132</a> and revision <a class="changeset" title="Actually block issues from closing when a blocking issue isn't closed (#1740)." href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/repository/svn/revisions/2800">r2800</a>.</li>
</ol>
Redmine - Defect #9331: Status list is sometimes missing values
https://www.redmine.org/issues/9331?journal_id=32533
2011-09-27T13:35:52Z
Frank Helk
<ul><li><strong>File</strong> <a href="/attachments/6599">Snap_Workflow.png</a> <a class="icon-only icon-download" title="Download" href="/attachments/download/6599/Snap_Workflow.png">Snap_Workflow.png</a> added</li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Closed</i> to <i>Reopened</i></li></ul><p>Sorry for not being precise ... the stati are indeed allowed for that role - see attached snapshots. To be precise, that role can change change the status from every value to any other one.</p>
<p>I would show the list with the missing values, too, but I could not reproduce the problem right now.</p>
<p>But definitely seen: At least the entry for "Zugewiesen" (=assigned) was missing.</p>
Redmine - Defect #9331: Status list is sometimes missing values
https://www.redmine.org/issues/9331?journal_id=32784
2011-10-10T12:37:17Z
Frank Helk
<ul></ul><p>First: Thanks for the tip ... the missing status values were blocked by a "related to" link. Breaking up that link solved the issue.</p>
<p>But that popped up another: I thought that the "related to" relationship only implies a "reference" that doesn't involve any restrictions like "blocked by" or "follows" would impose. Is that behaviour intended for the "related to" relationship ?</p>
Redmine - Defect #9331: Status list is sometimes missing values
https://www.redmine.org/issues/9331?journal_id=32804
2011-10-11T21:17:23Z
Mischa The Evil
<ul></ul><p><em>Frank Helk</em> wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>First: Thanks for the tip ... the missing status values were blocked by a "related to" link. Breaking up that link solved the issue.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That seems utterly strange...:/</p>
<p><em>Frank Helk</em> wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>But that popped up another: I thought that the "related to" relationship only implies a "reference" that doesn't involve any restrictions like "blocked by" or "follows" would impose. Is that behaviour intended for the "related to" relationship ?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You're right. The "related to" relationship should not trigger <strong>any</strong> restrictions AFAIK.<br />I've just tried to reproduce this behaviour on <a class="source" href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/repository/svn/revisions/7623/entry/trunk">source:/trunk@7623</a> and haven't been able to do so succesfully. Thus, so far, I'd say that the "related to" relationship also <strong>does not</strong> trigger <strong>any</strong> restrictions in general and logically that the issue you were experiencing should be classified as an exception.</p>
<p>The above leads me automatically to the following question: are you (still) able to reproduce this error? And, if yes, could you provide more information about you Redmine stack and configuration (see <a class="wiki-page" href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/Submissions">Submissions</a>)?</p>
Redmine - Defect #9331: Status list is sometimes missing values
https://www.redmine.org/issues/9331?journal_id=32838
2011-10-13T09:02:35Z
Frank Helk
<ul></ul><p>Mischa The Evil wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>You're right. The "related to" relationship should not trigger <strong>any</strong> restrictions AFAIK.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>OK - good to know that we're on the same line ...</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I've just tried to reproduce this behaviour on <a class="source" href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/repository/svn/revisions/7623/entry/trunk">source:/trunk@7623</a> and haven't been able to do so succesfully. Thus, so far, I'd say that the "related to" relationship also <strong>does not</strong> trigger <strong>any</strong> restrictions in general and logically that the issue you were experiencing should be classified as an exception.<br />The above leads me automatically to the following question: are you (still) able to reproduce this error?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I've just tried it and I were not able to reproduce it ... so we might file that as exception. And I will keep an eye on it.</p>
<p>Unfortunately the creation and deletion of ticket relations seems not to be part of the ticket history, so I can't track that part precisely in the offending ticket. The only thing I can say ist that this ticket is kind of old, supposed to be created under Redmine 0.8.7 (My update path that far is 0.8.7 -> 1.0.1 -> 1.0.3 -> 1.2.0).</p>
<p>Since you've asked:</p>
<ul>
<li>Redmine 1.2.0</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>ruby 1.8.6 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 287) [i386-mswin32]</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>MySQL 5.1.37</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>LOCAL GEMS</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<p>actionmailer (2.3.11, 2.3.5, 2.2.2)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>actionpack (2.3.11, 2.3.5, 2.2.2)<br />activerecord (2.3.11, 2.3.5, 2.2.2)<br />activeresource (2.3.11, 2.3.5, 2.2.2)<br />activesupport (2.3.11, 2.3.5, 2.2.2)<br />fxri (0.3.6)<br />fxruby (1.6.16 x86-mswin32-60)<br />hpricot (0.6.164 mswin32)<br />i18n (0.4.2)<br />log4r (1.0.5)<br />mysql (2.8.1 x86-mswin32)<br />ptools (1.1.6)<br />rack (1.1.1, 1.0.1)<br />rails (2.3.11)<br />rake (0.8.7, 0.8.1)<br />ruby-opengl (0.60.0 i386-mswin32)<br />test-unit (2.0.1)<br />win32-api (1.2.1 x86-mswin32-60, 1.2.0 x86-mswin32-60)<br />win32-clipboard (0.4.4)<br />win32-dir (0.3.2)<br />win32-eventlog (0.5.0)<br />win32-file (0.5.5)<br />win32-file-stat (1.3.1)<br />win32-process (0.5.9)<br />win32-sapi (0.1.4)<br />win32-sound (0.4.1)<br />windows-api (0.2.4)<br />windows-pr (0.9.3)</p>
Redmine - Defect #9331: Status list is sometimes missing values
https://www.redmine.org/issues/9331?journal_id=34553
2011-12-07T21:29:34Z
Mischa The Evil
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Reopened</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> changed from <i>Invalid</i> to <i>Cant reproduce</i></li></ul><p>Please re-open if the issue re-occurs.</p>
Redmine - Defect #9331: Status list is sometimes missing values
https://www.redmine.org/issues/9331?journal_id=40396
2012-08-16T10:49:29Z
José Campos
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Closed</i> to <i>Reopened</i></li></ul><p>This issue occurred to me too. The Closed status is missing in only one of our issues, and the user role can do pretty any change in status for this tracker. The issue does have two related issues (I haven't tried to delete the relation, though).</p>
<p>--- <br />mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.1.49, for debian-linux-gnu (x86_64) using readline 6.1<br />ruby 1.8.7 (2010-08-16 patchlevel 302) [x86_64-linux]<br />rails (3.2.6)<br />Redmine 2.0.3.devel.10153</p>
Redmine - Defect #9331: Status list is sometimes missing values
https://www.redmine.org/issues/9331?journal_id=40397
2012-08-16T10:55:24Z
José Campos
<ul></ul><p>Sorry, my (BIG) mistake. I had a blocking issue. You can close this issue again. Sorry for the mistake.</p>
Redmine - Defect #9331: Status list is sometimes missing values
https://www.redmine.org/issues/9331?journal_id=52033
2013-09-24T19:06:50Z
Mischa The Evil
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Reopened</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> changed from <i>Cant reproduce</i> to <i>Invalid</i></li></ul>