Feature #3012

version field request

Added by takuro monji over 10 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:2009-03-18
Priority:NormalDue date:2013-04-30
Assignee:-% Done:

0%

Category:Issues
Target version:-
Resolution:

Description

I am checking up "Redmine" to change issue tracking system from "JIRA" to "Redmine".
But there are some problems for change.

I want to append some features as follows.
  • allow the version field on an issue to assign multiple versions.
  • add "affected version" field. (means which versions are affected by the issue)
  • add "multiple select" custom field. (Feature #1189)

Our project management system like this.

 Core-Module (Package/Framework)
      |- Project A (customize for CustomerA)
      |- Project B (customize for CustomerB)
      |- ...

If I fix core-module, the issue has much effect on some projects. So I want you to support multiple select version field.

We can change to "Redmine" if there features include in version 0.9.
I want you to think about these features.

History

#1 Updated by takuro monji over 10 years ago

typo:

I want to append some features as follows.

=> I want you to append some features as follows.

Of course, If you cannot, I'll append these features by myself.
But I want you to support these features as official functions.

#2 Updated by Robert Pollak over 10 years ago

We would also like to have an "affected version" field. But I just found the "custom fields" feature. This might cover our use case.

#3 Updated by Dipan Mehta over 6 years ago

This functionality is now possible out-of-the-box using custom field of type "version".

This issue should be closed now.

#4 Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA over 6 years ago

  • Due date set to 2013-04-30
  • Status changed from New to Needs feedback

Dipan Mehta wrote:

This functionality is now possible out-of-the-box using custom field of type "version".

This issue should be closed now.

I have set due date.

#5 Updated by Dipan Mehta over 6 years ago

The same applies to issues #5996 - is a duplicates of #2096 as well.

#6 Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA over 6 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#7 Updated by Daniel Felix over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Needs feedback to Closed

This seems to be resolved. As there is no other feedback, I'm closing this issue.

Also available in: Atom PDF