Reversed order of priorities on the issue summary page
|Assignee:||Jean-Philippe Lang||% Done:|
The summary page holds a lot of useful info. What looks a bit counter-intuitive to me though, is that the list of priorities runs from low (at the top) to high (at the bottom):
Would it be an idea to consider reversing this order? High and "at the top" are similar concepts and would cause less cognitive dissonance, IMO.