Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #42699

open

[Suggestion] Ordering of *Related issues* by status and by priority level

Added by Renaud GOSSE 2 months ago. Updated 16 days ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Issues
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Resolution:

Description

Hello,
I would like to propose the ordering of Related issues by status and by priority level instead of the actual unordered status.

Please find in attachment a patch (order_the_related_issues_by_status_and_priority.patch) that works for redmine v6 & v5 stable branch

This screenshot is made on the fresh development redmine, the Related issues are ordered accordingly.

Relevant tests were passing with ruby 3.3.8 on main branch (of github) somehow not really working on v6 but it does not seem related to my modifications (see redminetests.txt)

I never used subversion so I don't really know how to do from there, but I would happily help

Have a good day !


Files

Actions #1

Updated by Veit Jahns 21 days ago

Support this proposal. Fits to a request which I got from our Redmine users. See my comment #42477-10

Is this also easy to extend so that other fields for sorting the related issues and subtasks can be used? Actually, this was the request by our Redmine users. Many thanks in advance!

Actions #2

Updated by Renaud GOSSE 17 days ago

Veit Jahns wrote in #note-1:

Support this proposal. Fits to a request which I got from our Redmine users. See my comment #42477-10

Is this also easy to extend so that other fields for sorting the related issues and subtasks can be used? Actually, this was the request by our Redmine users. Many thanks in advance!

Honestly, I wanted to keep it simple for the Redmine distribution, but I tweaked it on my end to fit my "fields" (other than alphabetical order...)

Somehow this could be achieved by adding a modal in the instance settings, but I'm a complete newbie in Ruby unfortunately so I can't promise anything.

Actions #3

Updated by Veit Jahns 16 days ago

Renaud GOSSE wrote in #note-2:

Honestly, I wanted to keep it simple for the Redmine distribution, but I tweaked it on my end to fit my "fields" (other than alphabetical order...)

Somehow this could be achieved by adding a modal in the instance settings, but I'm a complete newbie in Ruby unfortunately so I can't promise anything.

But even then, you are more expert on this matter than I am. :) I fully understand your concern, but I also prefer that our instance stays as close to the Redmine distribution as possible. This makes updating the instance easier. But I also just wanted to provide input (hoping that others might have this requirement too).

Anyway, thank you for looking into this! If I can be of assitance, please, let me know.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF