Defect #4648
Using repository comments to change issue status conflicts with workflow
| Status: | New | Start date: | 2010-01-25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | SCM | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| Resolution: | Affected version: |
Description
Consider the following status workflow options:
The Bug Tracker has both Resolved and Closed.
The Feature Tracker has only Closed.
If I configure the repository setting to use the fixes keyword to change the status to Resolved.
If I commit a change that says fixes #30 and #30 is a feature I will not be able to modify the status for that issue anymore (unless I change the workflow).
In my opinion it should be fixed to either allow different repository options per tracker (BEST)
Or to allow a status change hierarchy say first resolved than closed than x etc.
Or to allow specific status change from the comment (something like set #30 closed) - Maybe this should be implemented anyways
Or not to change the status to a status that is not in the workflow.
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by Sebastian Cabot almost 10 years ago
Any news?
#2
Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA about 9 years ago
- Category changed from Administration to SCM