Sebastian Paluch

  • Registered on: 2014-11-19
  • Last connection: 2020-01-24

Activity

Reported issues: 49

2020-01-24

09:29 Redmine Feature #29482: Query system for Projects page
Related #32818.

2020-01-16

10:00 Redmine Feature #32818 (New): Add a system settings for default results display format of project query
Add a system settings for default results display format ("Display results as") of project query, so that we make que...
09:51 Redmine Defect #32772: Tabs are displayed on two lines when the total width of the tabs is greater than 2...
Bernhard Rohloff wrote:
> @Sebastian Paluch can you double check that the problem is gone after applying the patch?
...

2020-01-15

11:00 Redmine Defect #32772: Tabs are displayed on two lines when the total width of the tabs is greater than 2...
Go MAEDA wrote:
> I think the theme you are using is not Alternate. The line at the bottom of the note header ("Upda...

2020-01-13

09:30 Redmine Defect #32772: Tabs are displayed on two lines when the total width of the tabs is greater than 2...
I have retried with:
* Chrome 79.0.3945.79, also in incognito.
* IE 11.1087
* Edge 41 / EdgeHTML 16
In both cas...
09:20 Redmine Defect #32770: Text formating on Redmine Home page does not work
Sorry, I was not precise in this issue.
The exact text entered in "Welcome text" is:...

2020-01-08

12:28 Redmine Defect #32772 (Closed): Tabs are displayed on two lines when the total width of the tabs is great...
New tab based history has issue with drawing tab frames.
!frame_issue.png!
Tested on Chrome and IE....
11:04 Redmine Defect #32770 (Needs feedback): Text formating on Redmine Home page does not work
On Home page following text formatting is not working anymore (was working in 3.4.4)...
10:48 Redmine Defect #32768 (Closed): Internal Error when issue text custom field is shown in Spent time query ...
On Spent Time tab, when selecting, under Options->Show, a custom field of long text type, I get internal error:
<p...

2019-10-18

09:27 Redmine Feature #15180: Start date on versions
Bernhard Rohloff wrote:
> +1 for the 2nd proposal
>
> Sebastian Paluch wrote:
> > I don't like 2. as this is too...

Also available in: Atom