Project

General

Profile

Actions

Defect #1416

closed

Inline code with less-then/greater-than produces @lt; and @gt; respectively

Added by Anonymous about 16 years ago. Updated almost 11 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Text formatting
Target version:
Start date:
2008-06-10
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Resolution:
Fixed
Affected version:

Description

I tried to put the following in inline code

<Location /redmine>
in a forum message and the result was <Location /redmine> e.g. <Location /redmine>

Is this expected? Looks like a bug to me.

  • Redmine-0.7.1
  • Rails-2.0.2
  • Ruby-1.8.6

Files

redcloth_arobas.diff (1.18 KB) redcloth_arobas.diff Jean-Baptiste Barth, 2009-03-22 11:57
redcloth3_3.0.4_escape.diff (1.34 KB) redcloth3_3.0.4_escape.diff Patch for Redcloth3 in conjunction with coderay 0.9.1 Anthony Groyer, 2010-02-26 18:09

Related issues

Has duplicate Redmine - Defect #2280: lesser symbol is printed as HTMLcodeClosed2008-12-05

Actions
Has duplicate Redmine - Defect #3020: Problem with wiki formatting for inline code with "@" charactersClosed2009-03-21

Actions
Has duplicate Redmine - Defect #2922: bad escaping of < and > in code exemple in redmine WikiClosed2009-03-06

Actions
Has duplicate Redmine - Defect #4794: wiki rendering bugClosed2010-02-10

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Brian Ericson almost 16 years ago

Ran into the same thing. Simple workaround is to stop the inline, add the , and continue the inline (ending it at the next and resuming it afterward).

(ampersand)abc <123> xyz(ampersand) results in abc <123> xyz

(ampersand)abc(ampersand) <(ampersand)123(ampersand)> (ampersand) xyz(ampersand) gives you abc <123> xyz, which is what you want.

Actions #2

Updated by Brian Ericson almost 16 years ago

Sorry -- "@" is not an (ampersand). Also, "add the ," should be "add the < or > characters," (if you follow a less than immediately by a greater than, redmine appears to not show it).

Actions #3

Updated by Jean-Baptiste Barth about 15 years ago

The problem is redcloth parses twice these characters ; the first time it escapes all "<" and ">", no problem about that, but the second it traduces resulting "&lt;" to "&amp;lt;" (and so on), which is incorrect. It seems to me it's a redcloth problem, so I patched recloth lib to avoid second parsing. See attachment and let me know your opinion about that.

Actions #4

Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 14 years ago

  • Category changed from Wiki to Text formatting
Actions #5

Updated by Anthony Groyer over 14 years ago

This works fine for inline code with @ separators. For

 
separators, this does not work.
Why not considering moving to RedCloth 4 that apparently fixes these 2 issues ?

Actions #6

Updated by Anthony Groyer over 14 years ago

This works fine for inline code with separators. For <pre> separators, this does not work.
Why not considering moving to RedCloth 4 that apparently fixes these 2 issues ?

Actions #7

Updated by Anthony Groyer over 14 years ago

In fact, the bug I described (with pre separators) appears when I use coderay-0.9.1 (for java syntax coloration) that I have copied manually in redmine/vendor/plugins.
I attached a patch of redcloth3.rb that seems to work.

Actions #8

Updated by Anthony Groyer over 14 years ago

Anthony Groyer wrote:

In fact, the bug I described (with pre separators) appears when I use coderay-0.9.1 (for java syntax coloration) that I have copied manually in redmine/vendor/plugins.
I attached a patch of redcloth3.rb that seems to work.

This patch solves the issue when the < and > are between a

<pre><code class="..."> </code>
tags but create a bug when they are used in
<pre> </pre>
tags.

Actions #9

Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 14 years ago

  • Subject changed from Include code and less-then/greater-than produces @lt; and @gt; respectively to Inline code with less-then/greater-than produces @lt; and @gt; respectively
  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Target version set to 1.0.0 (RC)
  • Resolution set to Fixed

The initial defect (< > inside inline code) is fixed by applying Jean-Baptiste's patch in r3567.
Anthony, your problem seems different and your patch breaks a few tests.

Actions #10

Updated by Luc Vandenbroucke almost 11 years ago

I do have about the same problem with lines starting with a space
like this

&lt;VLAN&gt;
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF