Defect #19227
Users.xml broken
Status: | Closed | Start date: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
Category: | REST API | |||
Target version: | - | |||
Resolution: | Duplicate | Affected version: | 2.6.0 |
Description
I put a request on users.xml.
User that logged in for the last time on redmine 2.1 get a xml-well-formated last_log_in timestamp. the users who logged in with redmine 2.6.0.stable (we recently upgraded) get a broken one.
Example of https://server/redmine/users.xml
<users total_count="34" offset="0" limit="25" type="array"> <user> <id>109</id> <login>some_forgotten_user</login> <firstname>Name</firstname> <lastname>Name</lastname> <mail>emailaddress</mail> <created_on>2013-06-18T09:16:21Z</created_on> <last_login_on>2014-08-25T12:34:48Z</last_login_on> </user> <user> <id>155</id> <login>a newly used user</login> <firstname>Name</firstname> <lastname>Name</lastname> <mail>emailaddres</mail> <created_on>2014-09-01 09:21:59 UTC</created_on> <last_login_on>2015-02-27 09:51:50 UTC</last_login_on> </user>
User ID 155, last_login_on seems not to be xml well-formated. User 109 who did not log in since we applied the upgrade is still ok.
What's wrong?
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA almost 8 years ago
- Status changed from New to Needs feedback
I think it is fixed by #19065.
#2
Updated by Jens Peter Kempkes almost 8 years ago
Wow. Superspeed Feedback.
Sorry. couldn't find this issue by the keywords I searched for.
#3
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 8 years ago
- Status changed from Needs feedback to Closed
- Resolution set to Duplicate
Yes, this is fixed in 2.6.2.
#4
Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA almost 8 years ago
- Duplicates Defect #19065: API: issue details created_on timestamp not formatted as expected added