Redmine

2019-05-05

18:37 Redmine Patch #28510: Show issue assignee gravatar in roadmap and version page

+1
As Marius says, adding Gravatar will be a simple and useful UI improvement. I have always felt that I could confi...

2019-04-04

17:07 Redmine Patch #13468: News creation over REST

Go MAEDA wrote:
> It looks a bit awkward to me to implement POST only without implementing GET, PUT, and DELETE. I t...

2019-03-29

07:34 Redmine Patch #13468: News creation over REST

I made a patch with small changes and tests to the C. X.'s patch.
I'm looking forward to using this feature in futur...

2019-03-26

09:46 Redmine Defect #31087: Deleting a version silently deletes its attachments

Go MAEDA wrote:
> You can reproduce the problem with the following steps:
>
> 1. Create a new version
> 2. Open ...

2019-03-25

03:59 Redmine Defect #30731: "View differences" buttons are shown in the repository page even without "Browse r...

Right, As you said the radio button should also be hidden.
I also thought that the proposed patch is simpler and bet...

2019-03-22

14:55 Redmine Patch #31066: Show projects using a table instead of an unordered list in the user profile page

Go MAEDA wrote:
> Thank you for the really nice improvement! But I encountered the following error while running tes...

05:09 Redmine Patch #31066: Show projects using a table instead of an unordered list in the user profile page

Maeda-san, Thank you for your feedback!
I also think that indented lists are better to see.
It is possible to inden...

2019-03-20

09:11 Redmine Patch #31066: Show projects using a table instead of an unordered list in the user profile page

I made a patch and attached it.

08:55 Redmine Patch #31066 (Closed): Show projects using a table instead of an unordered list in the user profi...

I felt that the project list on the Profile page looks better 'table' style than 'ul' style. Especially on users with...

2019-03-19

09:53 Redmine Defect #30099: Multiple blank lines in pre tags are not preserved in Textile

Go MAEDA wrote:
> This patch causes a problem reported as #30987.
>
> I think r17891 should be reverted.
Sorry...