Feature #16314
closed
Redirect back is overheated
0%
Description
Take a look at these code lines:
source:trunk/app/controllers/application_controller.rb@13036#L368
It is not used at all.
source:trunk/app/controllers/application_controller.rb@13036#L399
It uses same functionality that method above (relies on HTTP_REFERER).
source:trunk/app/helpers/application_helper.rb@13036#L1100
It could be replaced with `helper_method :back_url`.
source:trunk/app/controllers/application_controller.rb@13036#L390
This condition is never satisfied. I did not find an usage.
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 11 years ago
- Tracker changed from Defect to Patch
- Assignee set to Jean-Philippe Lang
Anton Orel wrote:
Take a look at these code lines:
source:app/controllers/application_controller.rb#L368
It is not used at all.
It's used at least in ContextMenusController.
source:app/controllers/application_controller.rb#L399
It uses same functionality that method above (relies on HTTP_REFERER).
Not the same functionnality, one relies on the :back_url param, the other one on HTTP_REFERER. But please provide a patch if you think they can be merged in a single one.
source:app/helpers/application_helper.rb#L1100
It could be replaced with `helper_method :back_url`.
Please provide a patch.
source:app/controllers/application_controller.rb#L390
This condition is never satisfied. I did not find an usage.
Used at least in AccountController.
Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA
Updated by Holger Just over 1 year ago
- Tracker changed from Patch to Feature
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Resolution set to Fixed
Anton Orel wrote:
Take a look at these code lines:
source:trunk/app/controllers/application_controller.rb@13036#L368
It is not used at all.
This is "main" back_url method since r19486 / #32850
source:trunk/app/helpers/application_helper.rb@13036#L1100
It could be replaced with `helper_method :back_url`.
This was changed in r19486 / #32850
As the methods have changed quite a bit since 10 years ago and we have added a lot of additional validations, I believe that this issue can now be closed.