Feature #1139

Being able to sort the issue list by custom fields

Added by Paolo Sulprizio over 9 years ago. Updated about 8 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:2008-04-29
Priority:LowDue date:
Assignee:Jean-Philippe Lang% Done:

0%

Category:Custom fields
Target version:0.9.0
Resolution:Fixed

Description

Issue list is sortable only by standard fields. It should be useful being able to sort the issue list by custom fields.

redmine_sortByCf_changeset_r2257.diff Magnifier (3.55 KB) Jm Delehaye, 2009-05-26 18:55


Related issues

Related to Redmine - Defect #5778: Defect in the filters (custom field) from the list of issue Closed 2010-06-28
Related to Redmine - Defect #11073: UserCustomField order_statement returns wrong output Closed

Associated revisions

Revision 2257
Added by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 9 years ago

Ability to sort the issue list by text, list, date and boolean custom fields (#1139).

Revision 2258
Added by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 9 years ago

Ability to sort the issue list by text, int and float custom fields (#1139).

History

#1 Updated by Patrick Oppenlander over 9 years ago

+1 !!

#2 Updated by yo perollet over 9 years ago

That's wright, it would be very useful to be able to sort the issue by custom fields

I'm very interested in this function

#3 Updated by Curtis Stewart over 9 years ago

I just had a request from one of my customers to be able to sort by the custom fields also.
+1

#4 Updated by Richard Nichols over 9 years ago

+1, this is a feature requested while evaluating whether to implement Redmine in our organisation.

#5 Updated by Brian Lopez about 9 years ago

+1
We'd really like to have this feature. We use a "ranking" custom field that works similarly to a priority, but is more like an order of assumed completion.
Currently we have to keep exporting to excel, and sort there.

#6 Updated by Nick Bolton about 9 years ago

+1
We use a similar custom field for sorting order that prioritized tasks should be completed.

#7 Updated by Vasia Pupkin almost 9 years ago

+1

#8 Updated by sunday walker almost 9 years ago

+1

ex.
Add the "severity" to the custom field.
I want sort by "severity".

#9 Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 9 years ago

  • Category set to Custom fields
  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Target version set to 0.9.0
  • Resolution set to Fixed

Done in r2257 and r2258.

#10 Updated by Jm Delehaye over 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Closed to Reopened
  • Assignee set to Jean-Philippe Lang

Very nice feature.
Thanks Jean-Philippe.

Is it possible to merge to 0.8 ?

#11 Updated by Mark P over 8 years ago

Is there any way to get this functionality in 0.8.3? I created a Unified DIFF from revision 2258, but it hung and did nothing when I tried to apply that patch to my 0.8.3 install. I suspect I am doing something incorrectly as I don't patch very often. Any ideas or direction would be very helpful.

#12 Updated by Jm Delehaye over 8 years ago

This patch seems to be OK on 0.8.3.

#13 Updated by Nikolay Kotlyarov over 8 years ago

+1
Very useful feature.

#14 Updated by VM Weseloh about 8 years ago

+1
A must have for us

#15 Updated by harald f├╝rthauer about 8 years ago

+1
would be also for us a very usful feature!

#16 Updated by harald f├╝rthauer about 8 years ago

Jm Delehaye wrote:

This patch seems to be OK on 0.8.3.

Is this patch also working with 0.8.4

#17 Updated by Matthew Baker about 8 years ago

I am running 0.8.5 and this fix brings up a GET/redmine error when I implement it. I even reverted back to 0.8.3 and I got the same thing.

#18 Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang about 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Reopened to Closed

Jm Delehaye wrote:

Very nice feature.
Thanks Jean-Philippe.

Is it possible to merge to 0.8 ?

No, it won't be merged to 0.8.

Also available in: Atom PDF