Feature #1139

Being able to sort the issue list by custom fields

Added by Paolo Sulprizio over 10 years ago. Updated almost 9 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:2008-04-29
Priority:LowDue date:
Assignee:Jean-Philippe Lang% Done:

0%

Category:Custom fields
Target version:0.9.0
Resolution:Fixed

Description

Issue list is sortable only by standard fields. It should be useful being able to sort the issue list by custom fields.

redmine_sortByCf_changeset_r2257.diff Magnifier (3.55 KB) Jm Delehaye, 2009-05-26 18:55


Related issues

Related to Redmine - Defect #5778: Defect in the filters (custom field) from the list of issue Closed 2010-06-28
Related to Redmine - Defect #11073: UserCustomField order_statement returns wrong output Closed

Associated revisions

Revision 2257
Added by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 10 years ago

Ability to sort the issue list by text, list, date and boolean custom fields (#1139).

Revision 2258
Added by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 10 years ago

Ability to sort the issue list by text, int and float custom fields (#1139).

History

#1 Updated by Patrick Oppenlander over 10 years ago

+1 !!

#2 Updated by yo perollet over 10 years ago

That's wright, it would be very useful to be able to sort the issue by custom fields

I'm very interested in this function

#3 Updated by Curtis Stewart about 10 years ago

I just had a request from one of my customers to be able to sort by the custom fields also.
+1

#4 Updated by Richard Nichols about 10 years ago

+1, this is a feature requested while evaluating whether to implement Redmine in our organisation.

#5 Updated by Brian Lopez about 10 years ago

+1
We'd really like to have this feature. We use a "ranking" custom field that works similarly to a priority, but is more like an order of assumed completion.
Currently we have to keep exporting to excel, and sort there.

#6 Updated by Nick Bolton about 10 years ago

+1
We use a similar custom field for sorting order that prioritized tasks should be completed.

#7 Updated by Vasia Pupkin almost 10 years ago

+1

#8 Updated by sunday walker almost 10 years ago

+1

ex.
Add the "severity" to the custom field.
I want sort by "severity".

#9 Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 10 years ago

  • Category set to Custom fields
  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Target version set to 0.9.0
  • Resolution set to Fixed

Done in r2257 and r2258.

#10 Updated by Jm Delehaye over 9 years ago

  • Status changed from Closed to Reopened
  • Assignee set to Jean-Philippe Lang

Very nice feature.
Thanks Jean-Philippe.

Is it possible to merge to 0.8 ?

#11 Updated by Mark P over 9 years ago

Is there any way to get this functionality in 0.8.3? I created a Unified DIFF from revision 2258, but it hung and did nothing when I tried to apply that patch to my 0.8.3 install. I suspect I am doing something incorrectly as I don't patch very often. Any ideas or direction would be very helpful.

#12 Updated by Jm Delehaye over 9 years ago

This patch seems to be OK on 0.8.3.

#13 Updated by Nikolay Kotlyarov about 9 years ago

+1
Very useful feature.

#14 Updated by VM Weseloh about 9 years ago

+1
A must have for us

#15 Updated by harald f├╝rthauer almost 9 years ago

+1
would be also for us a very usful feature!

#16 Updated by harald f├╝rthauer almost 9 years ago

Jm Delehaye wrote:

This patch seems to be OK on 0.8.3.

Is this patch also working with 0.8.4

#17 Updated by Matthew Baker almost 9 years ago

I am running 0.8.5 and this fix brings up a GET/redmine error when I implement it. I even reverted back to 0.8.3 and I got the same thing.

#18 Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from Reopened to Closed

Jm Delehaye wrote:

Very nice feature.
Thanks Jean-Philippe.

Is it possible to merge to 0.8 ?

No, it won't be merged to 0.8.

Also available in: Atom PDF