Feature #2621: Errors when editing an issue that was just edited - StaleObjectError - Redmine

Feature #2621

Errors when editing an issue that was just edited - StaleObjectError

Added by Eric Davis almost 12 years ago. Updated over 8 years ago.

Status:

Closed

Start date:

2009-01-29

Priority:

Normal

Due date:

Assignee:

% Done:

Category:

Issues

Target version:

Resolution:

Duplicate

Description

What should happen¶

User A opens issue #100 and starts to update it with content and files
User B opens issues #100, changes the status, and saves
User A submits the form
Images are uploaded
Redmine finds User A's data was stale
Redmine redirect User A to the edit form with the data User A has seen but without a stale lock
Redmine displays User A's comment and time entry data properly in the form
Redmine displays an Error message saying the data was updated by another user
User A checks the form and resubmits
Redmine saves User A's data

Bugs¶

8. The error should say which data was updated. Since User B changed the Status it should say "Status was changed to XYZ"

9. Re-submitting the form fails because Redmine is using the stale lock and not a fresh one. Since the lock is never renewed, the user will be unable to submit the form successfully.

I have working code and will integrate it once it's been tested and cleaned up

stale-error-messages.png (56.8 KB) Eric Davis, 2009-12-09 01:16

0001-Handle-the-StaleObjectError-when-two-users-edit-the-.patch (12 KB) Eric Davis, 2009-12-09 01:18

Related issues

History

#1 Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 11 years ago

Re-submitting the form fails because Redmine is using the stale lock and not a fresh one.

It prevents user B from overwriting user A's changes by simply re-submitting the form.
Surely, it's a poor design but it's not a defect.

#2 Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 11 years ago

Tracker changed from Defect to Feature

#3 Updated by Eric Davis over 11 years ago

Jean-Philippe Lang wrote:

It prevents user B from overwriting user A's changes by simply re-submitting the form.
Surely, it's a poor design but it's not a defect.

It puts the user into a position where they either lose their data or have to copy and paste it all into a new browser tab, hence the defect. If you look the form when there is a conflict, there is a hidden field for lock_version that is the stale lock. So at that point, the user cannot ever submit the form, even if they reconcile the differences. If the error is going to be handled by displaying a form, then the form should be functional.

#4 Updated by Eric Davis almost 11 years ago

File stale-error-messages.png added
Target version set to 0.9.0
% Done changed from 50 to 0

I've attached a patch to fix thi, I've ran into it many times and every time I lose data. This patch fixes several things and makes the user interface more friendly (I hope):

When a conflict occurs, the user can submit their change
The conflicting fields are shown to the user (in Red)
File attachments that failed are saved and re-associated (this reverts the fix in r2875 / #3846. If the user just spent a bunch of time to upload a large file, deleting it could make them unhappy).

I'm ready to commit this fix if it looks good.

Here's a screenshot of what the user would see if a conflict occurred.

#5 Updated by Eric Davis almost 11 years ago

File 0001-Handle-the-StaleObjectError-when-two-users-edit-the-.patch added

#6 Updated by Robert Chady almost 11 years ago

It does not appear to list any journal entries that accompany the updates. Could you include the journal entries that go with the changes so the user has all the information available to them?