issue's start date could be the latest due date of predecessors
|Target version:||Candidate for next minor release|
currently, the start date of a issue must be later than the latest due date of predecessors.
it means i cannot continue working in the same day.
i have made a patch for fix it.
#8 Updated by David Gessel about 3 years ago
I apologize, I didn't find this 6 year old Issue and filed #19516. Thanks to Go MAEDA for catching it.
If B's start (Bs) follows A's end (Ae), Bs !=< Ae does not reflect typical reality, it should be Bs !< Ae.
It is perfectly logical and reasonable to plan to start issue B the same day issue A is resolved. There's no reason to enforce in planning an "A's done! Everybody go home early!" rule. It should be entirely practical to plan to resolve 100 sequential issues on a single day, though perhaps a bit optimistic even just for the overhead of closing them out.