Defect #5329
Time entries report broken on first week of year
| Status: | Closed | Start date: | 2010-04-15 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: |  Jean-Philippe Lang | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | Time tracking | |||
| Target version: | 2.3.0 | |||
| Resolution: | Fixed | Affected version: |
Description
Redmine stores some additional columns time entries:
- tmonth ->
date.month - tyear ->
date.year - tweek ->
date.cweek
These are used to support group by of the time entries in the reports view. However, there is an edge case which breaks the code.
Consider the following 2 time entry:
| field | Time Entry 1 | Time Entry 2 |
|---|---|---|
| spent_on | 2009-12-12 | 2010-01-01 |
| tmonth | 12 | 01 |
| tyear | 2009 | 2010 |
| tweek | 53 | 53 |
Both are in the same week, but in different years. This leads to the second entry to be not displayed often, and if then in the wrong week, i.e. 2010-53. For the group-by week, instead of date.year, date.cwyear should be used. It results in 2009 for the second example entry.
The attached patch creates a test for that. It also adds the two time entries above as fixtures. Thus, some other tests had to be adapted.
functional_test_for_problem.patch 
(4.11 KB)
5329_add_year_of_week_to_time_entries.diff
(6.91 KB)
time_report.rb.patch
(863 Bytes)
time_report.rb.2.patch
- no tabs
(1.04 KB)
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by Holger Just over 11 years ago
- File 5329_add_year_of_week_to_time_entries.diff added
The attached patch fixes the edge case.
It introduces a new field named twyear to the time entries. It contains the year of the week of the entry. So for the above example, its content for both entries would be 2009. That way, it is possible to properly group based on weeks.
The included tests run in a current trunk.
#2
Updated by Holger Just over 11 years ago
Just verified that patch again on a current trunk.
It is clean and does what it advertises. I'm just not 100% sure if I managed to find all usages of the week stuff in time_entries. But I'm rather confident, I did.
#3
Updated by Holger Just over 11 years ago
Okay, after thinking a bit more about it (and fixing some other bugs :)), I conclude that the whole concept of denormalizing the week into the database for grouping can not properly work.
This is because the week boundaries expected by a user are actually not fixed but depend on her settings. So the actual data set in a group depends on user settings. To always show the correct result, we would have to
- either save at least two variants of the tweek + twyear (for week starting sunday or monday)
- or calculate the week using SQL-functions.
I would prefer the second method. Unfortunately, these functions are not fully standardized, so there would be a differentiation needed for different database engines.
Until then, the attached patch fixes the behavior for the standard commercial week starting on Mondays.
#4
Updated by Daniel Felix about 9 years ago
- Status changed from New to Needs feedback
- Affected version (unused) deleted (
devel)
This is another issue regarding the timelog. Someone who can confirm this is still able to reproduce in trunk?
#5
Updated by Alexey Verin about 9 years ago
Please, update patch for version 2.2.1.
My Ruby skill is not enough for this (
#6
Updated by Mischa The Evil about 9 years ago
Daniel Felix wrote:
[...] Someone who can confirm this is still able to reproduce in trunk?
I can't remember any changes that fixes this issue specifically, though I'm unable to test this on current trunk.
#7
Updated by Daniel Felix about 9 years ago
- Status changed from Needs feedback to Confirmed
Alexey already encountered this big again. (See linked ticket)
This is the confirmation for this issue.
#8
Updated by Filou Centrinov almost 9 years ago
Duplicate: #13159
#9
Updated by Filou Centrinov almost 9 years ago
- File time_report.rb.patch added
I fixed this issue with a patch. Could we add this to Redmine 2.3?
I verfied my solution for different weeks constellations: Years with 52 and 53 weeks or first week that starts in last year and those which don't. Everthing works fine.
#10
Updated by Filou Centrinov almost 9 years ago
- File time_report.rb.2.patch added
#11
Updated by Daniel Felix almost 9 years ago
The patch works on my testsystem too. Thanks for providing this patch!
#12
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 9 years ago
- Target version set to Candidate for next minor release
#13
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 9 years ago
- Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
- Assignee set to Jean-Philippe Lang
- Target version changed from Candidate for next minor release to 2.3.0
- Resolution set to Fixed
Patch committed in r11471 with a test, thanks.
#14
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 9 years ago
- Subject changed from Group-by week of time entries breaks on edge cases to Time entries report broken on first week of year
#16
Updated by Pavel Potcheptsov almost 9 years ago
Hello, I've updated to 2.3.0.
Is it all right with:
Project -> Overview -> Report -> Details: Days, Add: User ?
What Days it should display?
In my case it displays days from 2012 year and not the last days, when time was logged in 2013.